Ask the coach — about the coach.
This is the AI coach that works with teachers in their daily check-in, answering for itself: how it coaches, what research shaped it, and who can see what. It's an AI, and it won't pretend otherwise — no salesperson in between.
This conversation lives in this browser tab and nowhere else. The coach here talks about itself — real coaching happens inside a private check-in with a privacy floor a public page can't have.
A few of the findings it's built on
Every design decision in the coach traces to a named finding. Four of the load-bearing ones — and what we built because of each:
Recording progress toward a goal, and reporting it to someone, measurably raises goal attainment.
Meta-analysis of 138 randomized trials (19,951 participants), Psychological Bulletin
Over a third of feedback interventions make performance worse. The dividing line: feedback aimed at the practice helps; feedback aimed at the person — including praise — backfires.
Meta-analysis of 607 effect sizes, Psychological Bulletin
AI that flatters measurably degrades people's judgment — while raising their satisfaction with it.
Controlled experiments, Science, 2025
Teacher coaching is among the most effective PD forms ever measured — and more coaching hours did not mean better outcomes. Specificity beats dosage.
Meta-analysis of 60 causal studies of human coaches, Review of Educational Research (they studied human coaches — the AI trials support goal attainment, and that's the only claim we make)
School leaders get the full evidence page — every finding, every named study, and what we deliberately don't claim — inside the platform dashboard.
The rest is better felt than described
The walkthrough shows a teacher's day with fictional data. The 30-day trial is the real thing — full access, no card.